Comic Website Self-Evaluation Rubric
Total Score: 100 Points
Category Criteria Points
Content Quality Storytelling, artwork, originality, consistency 20
User Experience (UX) Navigation, readability, accessibility 20
Design & Visual Appeal Layout, branding, aesthetics 15
Technical Performance Speed, responsiveness, reliability 15
Community & Engagement Interaction and audience engagement 15
Professionalism & Maintenance Updates, accuracy, professionalism 15
Total 100
1. Content Quality (20 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent Exceptional artwork and storytelling; highly engaging and original 18–20
Good Strong content with minor weaknesses 14–17
Satisfactory Average quality; some inconsistencies 10–13
Needs Improvement Weak storytelling or artwork quality 0–9
Indicators
• Clear narrative structure
• High-quality illustrations
• Original characters and concepts
• Consistent updates
• Proper grammar and spelling
2. User Experience (UX) (20 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent Easy to navigate; users find content effortlessly 18–20
Good Generally intuitive with minor issues 14–17
Satisfactory Some navigation confusion 10–13
Needs Improvement Difficult to use or locate content 0–9
Indicators:
• Clear menus
• Logical organization
• Easy chapter navigation
• Accessibility features
• Minimal clicks to reach comics
3. Design & Visual Appeal (15 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent Professional, cohesive, visually engaging 14–15
Good Attractive but could be refined 11–13
Satisfactory Functional but not memorable 8–10
Needs Improvement Cluttered or inconsistent design 0–7
Indicators:
• Consistent colour scheme
• Effective typography
• Strong branding (using narrative and storytelling techniques to define and communicate a company's identity and value.)
• Appropriate use of images
• Visual hierarchy (the practice of arranging and prioritizing elements in a composition so that viewers instantly understand their order of importance)
4. Technical Performance (15 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent Fast loading and highly reliable 14–15
Good Minor delays or occasional issues 11–13
Satisfactory Noticeable performance problems 8–10
Needs Improvement Frequent errors or slow load times 0–7
Indicators:
• Fast page loads
• No broken links
• Stable hosting
• Secure connection (HTTPS)
• Responsive interactions
5. Community & Engagement (15 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent Strong audience interaction 7
Good Some engagement opportunities 4
Satisfactory Limited interaction 3
Needs Improvement No engagement features 1
Indicators:
• Creator updates
• Fun participation
6. Professionalism & Maintenance (15 Points)
Level Description Points
Excellent, well-maintained, and professional 7
Good, mostly professional with minor issues 4
Satisfactory Some outdated content 3
Needs Improvement Neglected or unprofessional 1
Indicators:
• Regular updates
• Working links
• Copyright notices
• Accurate information
Scoring Guide
Score Rating
90–100 Outstanding
80–89 Very Good
70–79 Good
60–69 Fair
Below 60 Needs Significant Improvement
Evaluator Comments
Strengths:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Areas for Improvement:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Final Score:
________ / 100
Overall Rating: